The Journal Gazette
 
 
Friday, May 13, 2022 1:00 am

Bipartisan lawmaking still best for public

Lee Hamilton

Having just watched a Supreme Court nominee supported by a comfortable majority of Americans draw just three Republican votes in the Senate, you could be forgiven for thinking bipartisanship in Congress is a thing of the past.

And in the case of Supreme Court nominees, you'd be right: The last time a nominee got more than half the votes of the opposition party was in 2005, and you have to go back nearly three decades – to Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 1993 – to find one who drew votes from almost all senators.

But if you look carefully, there are plenty of signs bipartisanship is still possible. President Joe Biden recently signed a bill reforming the Postal Service, which drew strong support from both parties. The same happened with a measure that keeps companies and universities from shielding themselves against lawsuits for sexual harassment.

There are other examples, but you'll notice something about them: They're not focused on hot-button issues. This is in no small part because in the Senate, a measure effectively needs 60 votes to pass – which means neither party can get bills approved without members of the other party.

This is often intensely frustrating to partisans of whichever party is in power. Yet I'd argue it's not a bad thing. In fact, the need for bipartisanship is pretty much baked into our system.

Political life is intensely polarized and many Americans live in what amount to partisan bubbles. For many people, this is just fine.

And ambitious politicians, always looking for an edge, have figured out how to use polarization to raise money by attacking another group, then goose election turnout by riling up their base.

There are some state legislatures where party-line lawmaking can produce actual laws – witness the wave of strict anti-abortion and anti-voting-rights measures passed last year and on the docket this year. But at the national level, intense polarization yields legislative deadlock.

And at both the federal and state levels, it produces laws with dubious futures.

By requiring lawmakers to work with their political adversaries, bipartisanship often produces better, longer-lasting legislation. It helps ensure that a proposed law will take into account a broad range of views, produces wider acceptance both within a legislative body and in the public at large, and perhaps most important, means that the legislation has a chance of surviving the next change in power. 

If you're just interested in scoring points with the base, then bipartisanship doesn't matter. If you want to have a beneficial and lasting impact on American life, it matters a great deal.

It may be tempting to throw up one's hands in despair at the displays of highly partisan behavior. But as a voter, there's something you can do about it.

Notice all the instances in which lawmakers work across the aisle to secure some piece of legislation. Pay attention to who does the heavy lifting to make it possible, and who stands in the way.

Then support the people who recognize that bipartisanship is the route to effective legislating.

Lee Hamilton is a senior adviser for the Indiana University Center on Representative Government. He was a member of the U.S. House for34 years.


Share this article

Email story

Subscribe to our newsletters

* indicates required
Newsletters