Skip to main content

The Journal Gazette

  • FILE - This undated file still image from video provided by WTOV-TV in Steubenville, Ohio, shows Jefferson County, Ohio, Judge Joseph Bruzzese Jr., who was shot and wounded Monday, Aug. 21, 2017, as he walked toward his county's courthouse in Steubenville, Ohio. (WTOV-TV via AP, File)

  • FILE - In this Monday Aug. 21, 2017, file photo, evidence markers are placed on N. Court Street and the sidewalk next to the Jefferson County Courthouse in Steubenville, Ohio, after Jefferson County Judge Joseph Bruzzese Jr. was ambushed and shot earlier in the day. (Darrell Sapp/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette via AP, File)

Thursday, July 18, 2019 11:10 am

Court to hear arguments about video showing judge being shot

Associated Press

 

YOUNGSTOWN, Ohio – Ohio appellate judges will hear arguments on Thursday about whether a surveillance video showing a county judge being shot and wounded is a public record and should be released to The Associated Press.

The Seventh District Court of Appeals in Youngstown is holding the hearing after Jefferson County Prosecutor Jane Hanlin objected to a decision by the Ohio Court of Claims that the video should be released.

Jefferson County Judge Joseph Bruzzese Jr. was shot outside a Steubenville courthouse in August 2017 by 51-year-old Nathaniel Richmond, who was then killed by a probation officer. Richmond had a pending wrongful death lawsuit in front of Bruzzese at the time. Bruzzese recovered and has returned to the bench.

Steubenville is roughly 30 miles (48 kilometers) west of Pittsburgh.

The AP subsequently requested a copy of the surveillance video recorded by a camera in front of the courthouse showing the shootings and the aftermath. Hanlin denied the request, saying the video shows sensitive courthouse infrastructure and is a security record, which exempts it from public disclosure under Ohio law because it involves direct threats against court officials and is needed to protect the safety of judicial officials and their staffs.

Attorneys for the AP disagreed and asked the Court of Claims to overturn Hanlin's decision. A special master considered arguments from both sides and recommended that Judge Patrick McGrath overrule Hanlin's objections.

McGrath wrote the video is not a security record because it doesn't contain information used to protect a public office from "attack, interference or sabotage."

No decision is expected for several weeks.