You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Local

  • I-69 lane restrictions to switch
    The current lane restrictions on Interstate 69 near the Dupont Road bridge will switch Thursday to the inside lane in both directions, the Indiana Department of Transportation said today.
  • 5 things of interest to area readers - Wednesday, August 20
    1. Today will be a great day for outdoor activities. Expect partly cloudy skies with a high in the lower 80s.
  • Council gives initial nod to Legacy panel
    At times, it took as long as two years for projects to move from idea to completion, and those ideas were brought forth only by Fort Wayne City Council members or the mayoral administration.
Advertisement

Coats, defense boss clash on Iraq

Senator insists US response cheapens GIs’ sacrifice

Sen. Dan Coats, R-Ind., and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel argued Wednesday over how and when the Obama administration should have responded to sectarian violence that threatens the U.S.-supported government in Iraq.

During a hearing by the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense that was webcast by the panel, Coats asked Hagel whether the White House “should have some response other than no response, at least to this point?”

Hagel replied, “Well, I don’t think it’s a matter of no response.”

Coats: “No response that’s making a difference.”

Hagel: “Well, I’m not sure of that. … The president is meeting with congressional leadership this afternoon” in a classified meeting.

Coats: “Do you think it’s too late? I mean, we’ve already lost territory, (insurgents have) already gained control of the second-largest city in Iraq, other cities that we lost blood and treasure and people lost limbs and died to save (during the 2003-11 war). We’ve already lost it. … ”

Hagel: “We ought to be clear: It wasn’t the United States that lost anything (since the exit of American troops). … We have done everything we could to help them. But it’s up to the Iraqis. They wanted to manage and govern their own country. So I don’t think we should assign the blame to the United States for this. … This current government in Iraq has never fulfilled the commitments it made to bring a unity government together with the Sunnis, the Kurds and the Shia. We have worked hard with them within the confines of our ability to help them do that, but we can’t dictate to them.”

Coats: “ … I’m not advocating any specific military action. But (Iraqis are) looking for leadership. They’d like to know somebody’s got their back. I think it might have been easier for those soldiers to shed their uniforms and run because they didn’t have anybody at their back. … ”

Hagel: “Well, when we’re not there, we’re not there. I mean, I don’t know what you would have expected the United States to do.”

Coats: “Well, I would hope we could get somewhere.”

Hagel: “Well, we are. That’s what we’ve been doing the last week” in classified briefings with members of Congress.

Coats suggested that President Barack Obama address Congress and the nation “and let us know where we are.”

bfrancisco@jg.net

Advertisement