You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

Advertisement

What didn’t happen can be just as newsworthy

– The year is coming to an end, so newspapers, magazines and websites are filled with Top Ten lists. You know the drill. For foreign policy mavens, this ritual takes the form of the Top Ten Most Important/Surprising/Dramatic Foreign Policy Events of 2013.

That’s all well and good. But what about all those Important Events that didn’t take place? There are plenty of good things that might have happened but didn’t, and there are a bunch of bad things that could have occurred but fortunately did not. In that spirit, here’s my Top Ten Non-Events of 2013, in the form of the Top Ten Headlines You Didn’t Read Last Year.

1. “U.S. airstrikes pummel Syria (and/or Iran).” There were plenty of reasons for the United States to use force against Syria or Iran this past year – not good reasons, mind you, but reasons – yet the Obama administration resisted the temptation to make a bad situation worse. Syrian President Bashar Assad’s thugocracy is a deserving target for some precision-guided “tough love,” and Iran’s clerical regime has plenty of warts, but military force wouldn’t have solved our difficulties with either country, and another Mideast war is not what the world needs right now. Kudos to those who understood the value of diplomacy and the virtues of restraint.

2. “Hillary Rodham Clinton endorses interim nuclear deal with Iran.” Amazing, isn’t it? The former chief diplomat is supposedly an expert on foreign policy and may still harbor a desire to be leader of the free world. Yet she’s been completely silent on the whole question of the negotiations with Iran, even though I’ll bet the Obama administration would love to get her to endorse its efforts. Does she support it? Damned if I know. Does she think it’s naïve, foolish or not bold enough? Your guess is as good as mine. No doubt we will find out HRC’s true convictions just as soon as her focus groups report in or her major donors tell her what to think.

3. “Europe gives up the Euro.” Nope. Didn’t happen. Not in 2012, and not this year either. No country left the Eurozone; in fact, a few countries still want to get in. Go figure. Of course, nobody offered up a credible long-term solution to the Eurozone’s economic difficulties either, or explained how a bunch of sovereign states could share a common currency without a common tax system and fiscal policy, or much greater labor mobility. But let’s be thankful for small favors: So far, the Band-Aids are sticking.

4. “Obama announces end to drone strikes and targeted assassinations.” By now, you’d think U.S. leaders would be a mite troubled by all the bad publicity they’re getting from the country’s drone policy, especially when innocent civilians keep getting killed by mistake. You might also think these same leaders would be worried about the precedent they were setting by using Special Forces and sophisticated technology to kill people in other countries merely because some intelligence information suggested that the targets might be planning to do something bad someday. After all, if the United States can kill people simply because it suspects them of contemplating wrongdoing, why can’t other states kill Americans whom they have some reason to believe are also planning some heinous act? President Barack Obama did say the United States was going to reduce its reliance on drones, but that decision would be cold comfort to the wedding party in Yemen that got hit in early December. If they were still alive, of course. Maybe ending this policy is on Obama’s to-do list for next year – right after he finally closes Gitmo.

5. “Nations sign global accord to address climate change.” Here’s what did happen last year: a record typhoon in the Philippines, disappearing glaciers, and a further decline in Arctic sea ice. What didn’t happen was serious progress toward a global agreement on measures to slow or halt man-made climate change. Listen closely: The sound you hear is humankind fiddling while the Earth warms.

6. “Obama pardons Edward Snowden.” I don’t doubt that Snowden broke the law when he exposed the NSA’s vast intrusion into civil liberties. I also don’t doubt that his motives were laudable and U.S. citizens are better off knowing what their government is doing. Yes, Snowden’s revelations have strained relations with allies and may have compromised “sources and methods,” but the real culprits were an out-of-control intelligence bureaucracy that couldn’t tell the truth consistently and appears to have assumed that its burgeoning data-gathering operation would remain secret forever. But instead of a presidential pardon (something Snowden deserves at least as much as some other recipients), Americans got more intense scrutiny on journalists and whistleblowers. Welcome to the Land of the Free, 2013 edition.

7. “Chinese and Japanese navies clash near disputed islands.” China and Japan remain at odds over the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands, and the two Asian powers seem likely to be intense rivals for many years to come. There’s plenty of loose tinder and flammable material lying around here, but nobody struck a match in 2013. That’s a good thing.

8. “U.S. officials: All U.S. troops will leave Afghanistan in 2014.” After more than 10 years of war, the United States might have concluded that it didn’t make much sense to spend billions of dollars each year trying to stabilize a country the entire GDP of which is a fraction of what the war was costing. So when Afghan leader Hamid Karzai started making lots of onerous demands in the negotiations over a long-term U.S. presence in this strategic backwater, U.S. officials should have grabbed their English-Pashto dictionaries and found the proper phrase for “Catch you later.” But instead, the United States started begging the Afghans for permission to throw good money after bad. Sigh.

9. “Netanyahu and Abbas sign final status agreement.” Repeat after me: “We all know what the final peace deal looks like.” “There’s no alternative to a two-state solution.” “The United States is firmly committed to reaching a final deal.” Yeah, I know: John Kerry parted the Red Sea and got the two sides talking again. But so what? They’ve been talking off and on since the early 1990s, with less-than-evenhanded U.S. “mediation,” and the two-state solution that some still think is inevitable is further away than ever. Who wants to bet we’ll see a headline like this in 2014?

10. “Iraq enjoys new-found stability.” It would have been really nice to read a headline like this in 2013, because Iraq suffered for years under Saddam Hussein and, after the United States ousted him, was then convulsed by a brutal internal conflict. Alas, 2013 was the deadliest year since 2008, with more than 7,000 civilians killed by violence. Americans were transfixed by the Boston bombing, but events like that tragedy were weekly occurrences in Iraq. Adjusted for population size, the death toll in Iraq would be equivalent to some 70,000 Americans dying in sectarian warfare last year.

Stephen M. Walt is a professor of international relations at Harvard University. He wrote this for Foreign Policy.

Advertisement