You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • Casting a vote for a national ID card
    Civil rights activists might not be able to stop Republicans from seeking electoral advantage by passing unnecessary voter ID laws. But Andrew Young, the former mayor of Atlanta and a one-time associate of Martin Luther King Jr.
  • N. Korea owes world its say on genocide
    The United Nations Security Council is holding an informal meeting this week about the findings and recommendations of the Commission of Inquiry into human rights abuses in North Korea, one of the most significant and startling investigations into
  • At 125, tower still stirs fancies, fears of Paris
    Pop the bubbly. It’s time to toast the 125th birthday of the Eiffel Tower, that iron, lattice-work marvel that scholar Roger Shattuck called “the first monument of modernism.
Advertisement

Accountability aids democracies’ disaster response

– Economic conditions in the Philippines could play a role in the severity of the damage caused by Typhoon Haiyan, but what about the country’s politics?

The Philippines is classified as “partly free” by Freedom House and has endemic problems with corruption and cronyism. But the country is an electoral democracy with an increasingly open political process. Will improving democratic conditions make any difference in the country’s disaster relief efforts? They could.

Events such as earthquakes, typhoons and droughts are acts of God and politically neutral. (Let’s ignore climate change for the moment.) But the level of development in a country will often determine the extent of the damage. Chile, for instance, experienced a more severe earthquake than Haiti in 2010 according to the Richter scale, but only a fraction of the death toll.

There’s some research to suggest that democracies are better at preparing for disasters and responding to them than autocracies.

Take for instance, Myanmar’s blocking of international aid after Cyclone Nargis or China’s crackdown on those who questioned the shoddy construction that was a factor in the death toll from the 2008 Sichuan earthquake.

Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen famously argued that famines do not occur in functioning democracies, because democracies “have to win elections and face public criticism, and have strong incentive to undertake measures to avert famines and other catastrophes.”

In a 2002 paper, London School of Economics economists Timothy Besley and Robin Burgess built on this argument in a study of how Indian regions responded to falls in food production and crop flood damage. They found that Indian states “where newspaper circulation is higher and electoral accountability greater” were far more responsive to people’s needs in the wake of disasters.

In 2010, Alejandro Quiroz Flores and Alastair Smith developed the idea further, arguing that democratic countries have greater incentives to prepare for disasters and put response systems in place than autocracies. “You have a better chance surviving a disaster in a poor democracy than a rich autocracy,” Smith says.

In democracies, leaders take a political hit when casualty numbers are high and response by authorities is perceived as inadequate. (Think George W. Bush after Katrina.)

If the number of casualties is low and the response and the authorities are seen as responsive, a leader can even benefit politically. (Think Barack Obama after Sandy.)

The incentives work differently for autocracies. Leaders depend not on public support but on the loyalty of their closest followers. So funds that could be spent on improving infrastructure or developing disaster response systems are better spent on enriching the leader’s cronies. Disasters can hurt autocratic governments by concentrating displaced people in small areas and giving opposition leaders a focal point to rally around.

The Fores/Smith paper argues that the anti-government protests that followed the 1985 Mexico City earthquake helped the city develop a stronger civil society, leading eventually to the direct election of the city’s mayor and the erosion of the PRI party’s monopoly on power. Patrick Meier argues in iRevolution that online organizing in the wake of disasters can serve a similar function.

Here’s where the bad news comes in for the Philippines. The country’s infrastructure is in rough shape after years of underinvestment. With one recent president convicted of corruption and another charged with election fraud, it would be understandable for Filipinos to be skeptical of their leaders.

Indeed, there’s already something of a blame game developing between President Benigno Aquino III and the local authorities in devastated Tacloban city. Hopefully this controversy will put some pressure on authorities to take steps to prevent the next storm from being quite so deadly.

Joshua Keating is a staff writer at Slate focusing on international news, social science and related topics. He was previously an editor at Foreign Policy magazine.

Advertisement