You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • Even great powers cowed by deaths of innocents
    Modern low-intensity conflicts are won and lost on their ragged edges. Nations act as though the careful plans of their militaries and intelligence operations can harness the chaos of combat and guide it to advance their interests.
  • Merkel the model for female leadership
    Would women be better than men at running the world? There’s a case to be made on the example of Angela Merkel, currently the longest-serving – and most popular – leader of a Group of Seven country.
  • Making your marketing, socially
    When the Fort Wayne TinCaps printed the names of their then-6,000 Twitter followers on a special jersey in 2013, they got national praise. ESPN’s official Twitter account said:
Associated Press
Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, speaks against Obamacare in the Senate. He spoke for 21 hours Tuesday and Wednesday.

Cruz weakens GOP with futile anti-Obamacare effort

Democratic politics is a constant tug-of-war between principle and practicality. In a well-functioning system, legislators accept that fact and compromise accordingly; the electorate rewards them for maturity and realism. In the United States, however, democracy is not functioning particularly well at the moment.

And so we have Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas.

Many – including, privately, many within his own Republican Party – accuse Cruz of grandstanding. Even accepting his objection to Obamacare as a matter of high conservative principle responsive to the wishes of his constituents, the course he has chosen, with fellow freshman Mike Lee, R-Utah, and a handful of other senators, is patently futile and counterproductive.

A Congressional Research Service analysis has demonstrated that most of the health law would still be implemented even if Congress excluded funds for it from a temporary spending bill. Meanwhile, that bill, whose ultimate passage Cruz is obstructing, would peg the overall budget at the truncated level set in the sequester – a limitation some regard as indiscriminate and ill-advised but that the GOP could trumpet to its grass roots as a victory for small government, if not for Cruz’s noisy crusade. And, of course, there’s the public backlash that might hit Republicans if Congress can’t pass the bill by Monday, forcing a partial government shutdown.

Cruz’s attempt to mount a legislative Battle of the Alamo is not worth waging even in terms of its benefits to conservatism. Nor does it make sense on the merits, since the health care law represents a step toward universal coverage and controlling costs.

And that’s not to mention the real-world effects of a shutdown, actual or threatened, on federal programs and the workers who operate them.

The political and procedural reality in the Democratic-controlled Senate is that Cruz and Co. will fail; a continuing resolution with no defund-Obamacare language will probably pass near the Monday deadline. What happens in the House is anyone’s guess, given that pressure from Mr. Cruz on conservative House back-benchers forced Speaker John Boehner to tie a defunding provision to the spending bill that’s now in the Senate.

According to some conventional wisdom, even if Cruz loses, he wins, gaining popularity among the GOP base and, hence, clout on the Hill. In that view, Boehner would be under pressure once again to use the spending bill for another symbolic attack on the health care law. Boehner and a large majority of his party should learn a different lesson: that Cruz’s extreme path is a road to ruin, for Republicans but, more importantly, for the country.