You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Local politics

  • Shine backs city workers’ protections
    Allen County’s Republican Party chairman is offering suggestions for how the Fort Wayne City Council can take some of the sting out of its recent decision to end collective bargaining rights for 500 municipal workers.
  • PACs filling Stutzman's account
    Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-3rd, has topped $1 million in contributions to his campaign for a third full term on Capitol Hill. His Democratic opponent in the Nov.
  • Another candidate challenges Stutzman
    Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-3rd, has a second challenger in his bid for re-election this fall.Libertarian Scott Wise has joined Stutzman and Democrat Justin Kuhnle on the ballot for the Nov. 4 general election.
Advertisement

Local congressmen split on DOMA decision

– Congressmen representing northeast Indiana were of three views regarding the Supreme Court’s decision to throw out the federal law that denies government benefits to same-sex married couples.

One was for it, one was against it, and a third thought Wednesday’s ruling was bad but could have been worse.

Freshman Sen. Joe Donnelly, D-Ind., praised the court’s decision.

“Like most Americans, I strongly believe in our country’s commitment to ensuring that all people receive equal protection under our laws,” he said in a statement. “The Supreme Court’s ruling today affirmed this principle and, in doing so, again reminded us of something that binds us all together in this great country.”

Coats said in a statement, “I am disappointed with the Supreme Court’s decision and continue to believe that marriage is a sacred union between a man and a woman.”

Coats voted in favor of the Defense of Marriage Act as a member of the Senate in 1996.

Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-3rd, said much the same as Coats, defining marriage as “the union of one man and one woman,” but he had a different take.

“Because marriage is ordained by God, instituted in every society throughout history, and the best environment for raising children, I am pleased that the court did not issue a sweeping mandate and has left marriage policy to the work of our democratic process,” Stutzman said in a statement.

“I am absolutely certain that the American people will continue the defense of marriage in state capitals across the country.”

bfrancisco@jg.net

Advertisement