You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • Pence ruling unlikely to survive gay-marriage tide
    Wednesday's news was heartbreaking for same-sex couples in Indiana and their supporters. The hundreds of marriages performed last month won't be recognized by the state, the governor has ruled.
  • Appalling anonymity fate of slain US teens
    Last week, the bodies of three Israeli teenagers who had been abducted and shot to death were found in a field near Hebron. Leaders in the United States offered condolences and prayers.
  • ‘Sinful’ and unlawful cannot be synonymous
    A strange thing happened after the Supreme Court ruled on the Hobby Lobby birth control case: Gay-rights organizations turned against legislation they once championed that would have outlawed workplace discrimination against gay people.

US dithers on Afghan force

The situation in Afghanistan is looking more hopeful than most Americans might think – if they think at all about that ongoing war. Though heavy fighting this spring has shown the Taliban to be a still-formidable force, the group has so far failed to gain significant ground. The Afghan National Army this month will pass a milestone, taking over the lead role in security. Meanwhile, voter registration has begun for a scheduled election next April that should give the country a new, democratically elected president – and perhaps a fresh chance at political stability.

One part of Afghanistan’s transition is lagging: U.S. and NATO plans for continuing military support after the withdrawal of regular combat forces at the end of next year.

At the last NATO ministerial discussion on Afghanistan, in February, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told his colleagues the U.S. contingent would number between 8,000 and 12,000 and that a separate counterterrorism strike force would be set up. But last week Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel declined to discuss the counterterrorism force in a news briefing, while the commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Joseph F. Dunford, refused to repeat Panetta’s troop numbers, saying it might be six to eight months before he would make a recommendation on the size of the follow-on force.

There has been a debate inside the administration about how large a force will be needed.

The uncertainty is problematic. A new report by former Afghanistan commander Gen. John Allen, former undersecretary of defense Michle Flournoy and defense analyst Michael O’Hanlon argues that a specific U.S. commitment to a follow-on force now would “make it clear to Afghans that only their own reluctance, and specifically that of the Karzai government, stands in the way of firming up the partnership.” It would also tell the Taliban and Pakistan that Afghanistan will not be theirs for the taking after 2014.

The report argues that a decent outcome is still possible in Afghanistan, but that the United States would risk “snatching defeat from the jaws of victory” if it accelerates its disengagement or fails to make an adequate commitment of resources after 2014. President Barack Obama needs to be clearer, and soon, about the mission he will support.