The pattern is all too familiar. Rocked by sexual abuse within its ranks, the military promises action. But abuse and a culture of impunity persist. It is time for fundamental change in how the military investigates and prosecutes these crimes.
The Pentagon said last week that an estimated 26,000 sexual assault reports involving service members were recorded in 2012, compared to 19,000 in 2011. The study by the Defense Department, based on anonymous surveys, shows that only a fraction of the assaults are reported.
The sobering news came on the heels of new embarrassments and controversies. Among them, Lt. Col. Jeffrey Krusinski, the official in charge of the Air Forces sexual assault prevention and response program, was charged with sexual battery.
President Obama expressed appropriate disgust with the militarys inability to make progress on this issue. There have been many promises of action over the past two decades. Its understandable that Congress, fueled by the outrage of female senators, is readying a variety of legislative approaches to the issue.
The key issue is whether the traditional military justice system – with its adherence to chain of command in deciding which cases should be investigated and how they should be prosecuted – is equipped to deal with sexual abuse cases. After all, most victims report that their perpetrator was of a higher rank and fear their claims wont be taken seriously or, even worse, will subject them to retaliation. Last years decision by then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta to push sexual assault cases up the chain of command for review was acknowledgment of these inherent tensions. The new openness by Panettas successor, Chuck Hagel, to changing the system that allows a commander to set aside convictions and sentences was recognition of the need to give some ground.
Defense Department officials, though, are unwilling to consider taking military justice out of the chain of command because of a fear that it will erode order and discipline. Yet Americas allied modern militaries – Britain, Canada, Israel and Australia – operate systems in which prosecuting authorities make decisions about crimes. Plans to introduce legislation that would adjudicate sexual assault cases outside the chain of command by trained military prosecutors will provide the opportunity to examine those models. A new approach is needed.