You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • Democrats stand fast with city employees
    Like so many of you, I have watched in disbelief as the Republican supermajority of Fort Wayne City Council worked relentlessly to dismantle the very foundation that makes this community strong.
  • Film gives public education boosters a say
    Rocky Killion is the Clark Kent of public education – the superman many have waited for.
  • Harassment fuels race riots
    SWAT teams and angry protesters clashed in a small St. Louis suburb for a third day Tuesday, following the death of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown. The eruption of protests and violence has been a long time coming.
Advertisement

Scouts’ inclusion plan takes a step backward

When they take the Scout Oath, boys pledge to be “morally straight.” But as they figure out how finally to remove their ban on openly gay Scouts, the Boy Scouts of America’s national leaders have become morally incoherent.

Last week the organization’s executive committee proposed changing the membership rules to allow openly gay youth – but not openly gay adults who would be Scout leaders – to participate.

The committee is attempting to find a compromise policy on a polarizing issue without rending a community that does a great deal of good.

Some Scouting sponsors still maintain a deep religious conviction that homosexuality is immoral; many others, who accept that gay boys don’t choose to be gay, are eager to end the discrimination.

But this is a bad way to deal with that challenging reality.

The executive committee earlier considered leaving the question up to individual troop sponsors. There was at least an argument for that as a pragmatic intermediate step. The proposal was silent on the evils of discrimination.

The latest plan is worse than silent. Excluding openly gay adults suggests that they are dangerous.

The logic is perverse: It’s OK for gay teens to learn, grow and serve in the fellowship of Scouting without lying about who they are – but only until they’re 18, after which they become a menace.

If the committee fears that gay Scout leaders will prey on boys, its proposal is ignorant. Predators can be found among gays and among heterosexuals. Any organization of children needs sound policies to guard against abuse.

The Boy Scouts boast that their policies to prevent and detect child abuse are “among the best in the youth-serving community.” That, not discrimination, is the best safeguard.

One explanation for the Boy Scouts’ bizarre proposal is that it corresponds with the results of a survey the organization recently conducted of its members. Boys favored lifting the ban on openly gay scouts; adult Scout leaders did not. That might reflect the views of the sponsoring organizations behind many troops. Yet it’s only a matter of time before the new generation fulfills the Boy Scouts’ commitment to nondiscrimination. The leaders will look better to history if they don’t wait for that new generation to do the right thing.

Advertisement