You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.


  • Letters
    'Greatest nation' isshallow in showing it So often I see what appear at first glance to be demonstrations of my fellow citizens' pride in America.
  • Letters
    ‘Greatest nation’ isshallow in showing itSo often I see what appear at first glance to be demonstrations of my fellow citizens’ pride in America.
  • Drivers inconsiderate of funeral processions
    I want to discuss proper funeral procession etiquette. I was leaving a funeral on Oct. 3, traveling down West Jefferson Boulevard to Covington Road.

Web letter by Ken McIntosh: Cutting budget forces us to separate ‘needs’ from ‘wants’

In the last 50 years we have only had a surplus in five years, 1969 and 1998 to 2001. In those five years, we had a Democratic president in 1998-2000 and a Republican in 1969 and 2001. We had a Republican majority in the Senate in 1998-2000 and a Democratic one in 1969 and 2001. The Republicans controlled the House from 1998-2001 and the Democrats in 1969.

I am willing to give both parties credit for the few surpluses we had but, more importantly, blame both parties for giving in and spending too much on too many “wants.” With only five balanced budgets in the last 50 years and a $16.6 trillion debt, it has to be a spending problem and not a revenue problem because we don’t tax enough.

On “Meet The Press” recently, the moderator, David Gregory, said we cannot really comprehend what $1 trillion is when we discuss $2.2 trillion in revenue with $3.3 trillion in spending and a $16.6 trillion debt. He said, “Chop some zeros” and discus it as a family budget and it becomes easier to understand. A family with an income of $22,000 but spending $33,000 a year with a $167,000 credit card bill puts it in a frame we can all understand.

There is no federal spending item that everybody dislikes, so to cut spending we have to separate what we need from what we want with the knowledge that somebody is going to get hurt. I would like to offer as an example the local Starbase program. (I don’t take a position on whether this program is good, bad or mediocre.) It has, according to The Journal Gazette, a $300,000 budget for next year to serve 800 students, and using last year’s attendance costs $375 per student. As students only go one day a week for five weeks and not all students in the area attend, this would appear to fall into the area of “want.” If parents had to pay 50 percent (or $187) per student to attend, I am sure the attendance would decline sharply if not evaporate, so it can’t be defined as a “need” like mathematics or English.

We all need to look at what “wants” we can reduce or don’t really need as when the credit card comes due, the interest rate is going to increase to the point we will have to reduce or eliminate some “needs” that will really hurt.


Fort Wayne