You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorials

  • Lilly has aversion to inversion
     It’s not just American tourists heading overseas these days. Increasingly, U.S. corporations are turning to “tax inversions” to move abroad and avoid high corporate tax rates.
  • HIP 2.0 is great, but we have a better choice
    As someone who was in on the birth of the Healthy Indiana Plan, I suppose I should feel paternal warmth at the praise that has been heaped on the program by Gov. Mike Pence in recent weeks.
  • A widening gap
    There appear to be a number of reasons for the backlog in processing more than 80,000 Hoosiers for Medicaid benefits this year.Indiana was one of 13 states that recently received a letter about the backlog from the U.S.
Advertisement

Furthermore …

GMO provision rides in on budget deal

When Congress approved a spending bill two weeks ago, members did more than avert a possible government shutdown; they gave Monsanto and other manufacturers of genetically modified crops and seeds a big pass.

Language attached to the bill shields the makers of genetically modified food from federal court decisions that would block the companies from selling goods due to problems or incomplete environmental tests. Language in the bill – which President Obama signed last week – requires the Agriculture Department to permit the selling and growing of the products even if courts say they are not ready for sale. Critics are dubbing it the Monsanto Protection Act.

Among groups protesting the law are the Center for Food Safety, the National Farmers Union and the American Civil Liberties Union.

The language was in a rider to the bill, so called because they ride on an unrelated but necessary bill that Congress is unlikely to defeat and the president isn’t likely to veto.

Like many other such riders, it’s not clear which member of Congress is responsible. Critics blame Senate Appropriations Chairwoman Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., but her office says the language was in a version of the bill before she became chair.

Double or nothing

Let’s see if we can get this straight.

Some Hoosier lawmakers don’t like a proposal to replace the computerized table games at the state’s two racinos with live games and human dealers. They call it an expansion of gambling – even though the number of games would be the same.

Yet they aren’t raising red flags about the Hoosier Lottery ’s newly expanded late night hours to buy tickets.

Hmmmm.

Advertisement