You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

Advertisement

Congress impedes necessary change

Status quo benefits special interests

Nearly two months ago, Patrick R. Donahoe, the postmaster general, announced that the Postal Service would stop Saturday mail delivery in August. At the time, we expressed the hope that Congress would treat Donahoe’s cost-cutting measure as a cue to address, at long last, the structural problems that necessitated it. Alas, it appears that lawmakers are bound and determined to do the opposite.

The Republican-dominated House has adopted a bill to fund the government for the rest of fiscal year 2013 that includes language historically interpreted to require six-day mail delivery. The Democratic-majority Senate did the same without even voting on an amendment from Sens. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., and Tom Coburn, R-Okla., that would have let the USPS stop Saturday delivery. This, despite the fact that the Postal Service is losing $25 million per day and has maxed out its $15 billion line of credit with the U.S. Treasury.

The USPS says ending Saturday delivery will cut its losses, projected to reach $7.9 billion this year, by up to $2 billion. Poll after poll shows that most Americans are willing to give up Saturday delivery rather than add to the risk of an expensive postal bailout later on. In the digital age, fewer and fewer people actually depend on mail; many regard USPS-delivered ads as a nuisance. According to a CBS News poll, 18 percent of the public says it “almost never” uses the mail – a figure that is bound to grow.

The arguments for the status quo have taken on a certain desperate quality. Even though every serious analyst to study the USPS’ financial predicament has recommended curtailing Saturday delivery, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., and Rep. Gerald E. Connolly, D-Va., say that shouldn’t happen until the USPS details exactly how it arrived at its savings estimate. Others have made an issue of the supposed defiance of Congress that the USPS demonstrated by trying to curtail Saturday delivery, when in fact the agency was doing lawmakers a favor by offering to take the political hit.

Congressional foot-draggers are ignoring public sentiment and postal management’s abundantly documented cost concerns in favor of postal unions, corporate mailers and other groups that cling to the outmoded postal business model, regardless of the potential cost to taxpayers. Ending Saturday delivery is only a small part of the change the USPS needs to survive. Yet seemingly even that is too much for a Congress wedded to the status quo and the special interests that benefit from it.

Advertisement