You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Business

  • Starting over, with help
    Lost work. Lost income. Lost hope.Just plain lost.Thousands of northeast Indiana workers lost their jobs when their employers downsized or closed operations during the recent recession and the slow recovery that followed.
  • Google silent as net neutrality hangs in balance
    Google, once boastful that it was the leading defender of a free and open Internet, has gone into the shadows.
  • Stocks, not cash, fund takeovers
    Big deals are back. To fund them, buyers are using a little creative thinking and a lot of common stock to fuel the best quarter for global takeovers since 2007.
Advertisement
Associated Press
Martha Stewart testifies in New York State Supreme Court on Tuesday. Stewart is at the center of a bitter legal battle between two of the nation’s largest retailers, Macy’s Inc. and J.C. Penney Co.

Stewart denies breaching pact

Says Penney deal made after Macy’s ‘struggled’

– Home décor and food guru Martha Stewart testified in court on Tuesday that she did nothing wrong when she signed an agreement to open shops within most of J.C. Penney’s stores across the country.

Stewart testified in New York state court in a trial over whether the company she founded breached its contract to sell cookware, bedding and other items exclusively at Macy’s when she inked the deal with Penney.

During three hours of testimony, Stewart, who founded Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc., denied Macy’s allegations that she did anything unethical and said she was only looking to expand her brand.

In fact, Stewart said it’s Macy’s that didn’t uphold its end of the agreement to try to maximize the potential of her business. She said her brand had grown to about $300 million at Macy’s, but the business was now “static” at the department store chain. She said she had hoped the business would exceed $400 million.

“We were disappointed,” Stewart, 71, wearing a light brown tunic and a miniskirt, testified. “We got to a certain dollar amount and struggled and never got any further.”

The trial, which began Feb. 20, focuses on whether Macy’s has the exclusive right to sell some Martha Stewart branded products such as cookware, bedding and bath items.

Penney signed a pact in December 2011 with Martha Stewart Living to open shops at most of its 1,100 stores by this spring. A month later, Macy’s renewed its long-standing exclusive deal with Martha Stewart until 2018, then it sued both Martha Stewart Living and Penney.

Macy’s is trying to block Penney’s from opening the shops. The company also is seeking to stop Martha Stewart from providing any designs to Penney – whether or not they carry the Martha Stewart label.

Martha Stewart and Penney are using what they believe is a loophole in the agreement between Macy’s and Martha Stewart to move forward with their deal. It’s a provision that allows Martha Stewart to sell some of the products that it offers in Macy’s stores at Martha Stewart stores, too.

According to Martha Stewart lawyers, because the Macy’s agreement doesn’t specify that Martha Stewart stores have to be “stand alone” stores, the mini shops within Penney’s stores would not violate the contract. Stewart said in court Tuesday that even Amazon.com could be considered a store, given that shoppers are shifting more to online buying.

“I don’t think you need walls to be a store,” she said.

Advertisement