WASHINGTON – Former defense secretary Robert Gates stopped bagging his leaves when he moved into a small Washington military enclave in 2007. His next-door neighbor was Mike Mullen, then the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who had a chef, a personal valet and – not lost on Gates – troops to tend his property.
Gates may have been the civilian leader of the world’s largest military, but his position did not come with household staff. So, he often joked, he disposed of his leaves by blowing them onto the chairman’s lawn.
I was often jealous because he had four enlisted people helping him all the time, Gates said in response to a question after a speech Thursday.
He wryly complained to his wife that Mullen’s got guys over there who are fixing meals for him, and I’m shoving something into the microwave. And I’m his boss.
Of the many facts that have come to light in the scandal involving former CIA director David Petraeus, among the most curious was that during his days as a four-star general, he was once escorted by 28 police motorcycles as he traveled from his Central Command headquarters in Tampa, Fla., to socialite Jill Kelley’s mansion.
Although most of his trips did not involve a presidential-size convoy, the scandal has prompted new scrutiny of the imperial trappings that come with a senior general’s lifestyle.
The commanders who lead the nation’s military services and those who oversee troops around the world enjoy an array of perks befitting a billionaire, including executive jets, palatial homes, drivers, security guards and aides to carry their bags, press their uniforms and track their schedules in 10-minute increments. Their food is prepared by gourmet chefs. If they want music with their dinner parties, their staff can summon a string quartet or a choir.
The elite regional commanders who preside over large swaths of the planet don’t have to settle for Gulfstream V jets. Each has a C-40, the military equivalent of a Boeing 737, some of which are configured with beds.
Since Petraeus’ fall, many have strained to understand how such a celebrated general could have behaved so badly. Some have speculated that an exhausting decade of war impaired his judgment. Others wondered whether Petraeus was never the Boy Scout he appeared to be.
But Gates has floated another theory.
There is something about a sense of entitlement and of having great power that skews people’s judgment, Gates said last week.
Among the Army’s general officer corps, there is little support for Gates’ hypothesis.
I love the man. I am his biggest supporter. But I strongly disagree, said retired Gen. Peter Chiarelli, who served as Gates’ senior military assistant. I find it concerning that he and others are not focusing on the effect on our guys of fighting wars for 11 years. No one was at it longer than Petraeus.
But other veteran commanders concurred with Gates. David Barno, a retired three-star general who commanded U.S. troops in Afghanistan, warned in an interview that the environment in which the top brass lives has the potential to become corrosive over time upon how they live their life.
You can become completely disconnected from the way people live in the regular world – and even from the modest lifestyle of others in the military, Barno said. When that happens, it’s not necessarily healthy either for the military or the country.
When President George W. Bush needed a savior for the foundering war in Iraq, he turned to Petraeus, making him the frontman for the troop surge in Baghdad. Petraeus did not disappoint. Violence dropped in Iraq after he became the top commander there. He returned home as a celebrity. In 2009, he was asked to flip the coin at the Super Bowl.
Being a four-star commander in a combat theater is like being a combination of Bill Gates and Jay Z – with enormous firepower added, said Thomas Ricks, the author of The Generals, a recently published history of American commanders since World War II.
Some retired generals have defended the benefits accorded to their active-duty brethren, noting that many of them work 18-hour days, six or seven days a week. They manage budgets that dwarf those of large multinational companies and are responsible for the lives of thousands of young men and women under their command.
In 2013, the base salary for a four-star general with at least 38 years of service will be almost $235,000, although federal personnel regulations limit their take-home pay to $179,700.
Unlike top civilians in government, top generals also receive free housing and subsidies for food and uniforms. And when they retire, those who have served at least 40 years get an annual pension that is slightly more than active-duty base pay – this year it is $236,650.