You choose, we deliver
If you are interested in this story, you might be interested in others from The Journal Gazette. Go to www.journalgazette.net/newsletter and pick the subjects you care most about. We'll deliver your customized daily news report at 3 a.m. Fort Wayne time, right to your email.

Editorial columns

  • Burma reforms merit skeptical optimism
    Not many dictators or military juntas willingly give up power. Will Burma’s regime prove the exception? That was the ever-present though mostly unspoken question as President Thein Sein toured Washington, D.C., this week.
  • Russia’s expulsion for spying smells of setup
    In the days of the Soviet Union, street maps of Moscow did not exist for most citizens, or they were deliberately misleading.
  • Museum revived – and it’s set to thrive
    Have you heard about the African/African-American Historical Museum? I heard it was being turned into a multicultural center. I heard that the entire collection was being auctioned. And I heard that it was being moved to another state.
Advertisement

Senator’s clarifying maneuver

There’s been a lot of chatter about Sen. Patty Murray’s big speech in which she claimed that Democrats hold the leverage in the coming “fiscal cliff” talks over the Bush tax cuts and that they should be prepared to let all the tax cuts expire if necessary to force the GOP’s hand.

The idea is that if all the cuts expire, Democrats can renew just the middle-class cuts, and dare Republicans to vote against it.

The Obama/Democratic proposal would cut taxes on all income up to $250,000, even that enjoyed by the “job creators” and “small-businesspeople” who make more than that. Republicans won’t support this proposal because so doing would deprive them of leverage over tax rates only on income above that level.

Murray is chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee – and she’s signaling that she thinks this battle makes for good politics. The idea is to separate the debate over the middle-class tax cuts from the debate over the high-end ones; if the latter debate can be isolated, it’s a tougher position for Republicans.

The Senate is expected to vote later this month on this proposal. Right now, we’re talking only about a continuation of the low rates. If the Bush tax cuts expire and Murray’s scenario comes to pass, Republicans would be forced into voting against an outright reduction of tax rates on all that income simply because they also want a reduction on income above that. If that doesn’t clarify the debate, it’s unclear what will.

Greg Sargent is a Washington Post columnist.

Advertisement